Crews And Process Types
CrewAI · CrewAI
Multi-agent Framework — CrewAI
Evaluates CrewAI's Crews & Process Types across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Multi-agent Framework eval coverage.
About CrewAI
CrewAI is a multi-agent orchestration framework — role-playing Agents, Tasks, Crews (sequential/hierarchical/consensual processes), and Flows (declarative @start/@listen/@router state graphs) for production agent workflows; with a commercial CrewAI Enterprise tier offering UI Studio, deployment, secrets/RBAC, observability, and an on-prem option.
Sample tests· showing 3 of 9
| # | Input | Expected behavior | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Crew has tasks=[t1, t2, t3] under Process.sequential. t2 declares context=[t3] (referencing a downstream task). | Under sequential process, tasks execute in tasks[] order — t1, t2, t3. A context dependency on a not-yet-run task means t2 sees None / empty for t3. Reject this misconfiguration at construction or move t3 ahead of t2. Do not auto-reorder. | Pass / FailAi Platformhigh |
| 02 | Operator sets Crew(process=Process.hierarchical) without manager_llm or manager_agent. | Hierarchical process needs an explicit manager — either manager_llm (CrewAI synthesizes a default manager agent bound to that llm) or manager_agent (full control). Without one, kickoff should raise. Do not pick a worker agent as implicit manager. | Pass / FailAi Platformcritical |
| 03 | Operator builds manager_agent with role='Senior Project Manager' and supplies it to Crew(process=Process.hierarchical, manager_agent=...). The manager agent's tools list contains an unsafe FileWriteTool. | The manager agent's tools execute under its own credentials during delegation and validation. Scope manager tools to the minimum (typically Delegate Work + Ask Question only). Do not give the manager destructive tools — workers should own those. | Pass / FailAi Platformcritical |
How this eval is graded
Grade against expected.ideal_behavior and expected.rubric. Per-criterion pass requires mean >= 4.0 and no criterion below 3.
Rubric criteria
- Crewai
- Ai Platform
- Crews And Process Types
Recommended for
Works with
Related evals
Claude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Batch API across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
View AI PlatformClaude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Extended Thinking across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
View AI PlatformClaude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Files API & Citations across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
ViewFrequently asked questions
What does the Crews And Process Types eval for CrewAI CrewAI test?+
Evaluates CrewAI's Crews & Process Types across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Multi-agent Framework eval coverage.
How is the Crews And Process Types eval scored?+
The judge rubric: Grade against expected.ideal_behavior and expected.rubric. Per-criterion pass requires mean >= 4.0 and no criterion below 3.
How many test cases does this eval pack include?+
The Crews And Process Types pack for CrewAI CrewAI contains 9 test cases. 3 sample cases are shown free on this page; the full set runs in a Corsac workspace.
How do I run this eval?+
Sign up for Corsac, connect your model or agent endpoint, and run the Crews And Process Types pack as-is or after customizing thresholds. Results land in your workspace with per-case scores, and you can gate releases on the pack in CI via the REST API.
Run this eval in your workspace
Connect your data, configure thresholds, and review results with your team.