
Tools And Tool Calling
LangChain (+ LangGraph) · LangChain
LLM Orchestration Framework — LangChain
Evaluates LangChain's Tools & Tool Calling across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's LLM Orchestration Framework eval coverage.
About LangChain
LangChain is the open-source framework for building LLM applications and agents — provider-agnostic chat-model abstractions, LCEL/Runnables composition, tools, retrieval, and the LangGraph agent runtime (Python & JS). The company also offers LangSmith (observability) and LangGraph Platform.
Sample tests· showing 3 of 9
| # | Input | Expected behavior | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Integrator defines a tool function with no type hints and a one-line docstring, then wonders why the model passes wrong-typed arguments. | Decorate with @tool and provide type hints + a clear docstring; LangChain derives the tool name, description, and args schema from them. The description is what the model uses to route, so it must describe purpose and arguments precisely. | Pass / FailAi Platformhigh |
| 02 | The model returns two tool_calls in one AIMessage; the integrator returns a single merged ToolMessage without matching tool_call_id. | For each AIMessage.tool_calls entry, execute the tool and return one ToolMessage whose tool_call_id matches the call's id. The next model turn requires every tool_call to have a matching ToolMessage; mismatched or missing ids break the conversation contract. | Pass / FailAi Platformcritical |
| 03 | A tool needs constrained inputs (an enum and a positive int) but the integrator relies on the docstring alone to communicate the constraints. | Define an explicit Pydantic args_schema (via StructuredTool.from_function or @tool with args_schema) so constraints (enums, ranges, required fields) are encoded in the schema sent to the model AND validated before execution. Reject invalid args, do not coerce silently. | Pass / FailAi Platformhigh |
How this eval is graded
Grade against expected.ideal_behavior and expected.rubric. Per-criterion pass requires mean >= 4.0 and no criterion below 3.
Rubric criteria
- Langchain
- Ai Platform
- Tools And Tool Calling
Recommended for
Works with
Related evals
Claude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Batch API across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
View AI PlatformClaude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Extended Thinking across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
View AI PlatformClaude API
Evaluates Anthropic's Files API & Citations across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's Foundation Model & API eval coverage.
ViewFrequently asked questions
What does the Tools And Tool Calling eval for LangChain LangChain (+ LangGraph) test?+
Evaluates LangChain's Tools & Tool Calling across 9 scenario-based test cases, each graded against an expected-behavior rubric by an LLM judge, from Corsac's LLM Orchestration Framework eval coverage.
How is the Tools And Tool Calling eval scored?+
The judge rubric: Grade against expected.ideal_behavior and expected.rubric. Per-criterion pass requires mean >= 4.0 and no criterion below 3.
How many test cases does this eval pack include?+
The Tools And Tool Calling pack for LangChain LangChain (+ LangGraph) contains 9 test cases. 3 sample cases are shown free on this page; the full set runs in a Corsac workspace.
How do I run this eval?+
Sign up for Corsac, connect your model or agent endpoint, and run the Tools And Tool Calling pack as-is or after customizing thresholds. Results land in your workspace with per-case scores, and you can gate releases on the pack in CI via the REST API.
Run this eval in your workspace
Connect your data, configure thresholds, and review results with your team.