Air For Review Natural Language Agentic Workflow Citations And Rationales

An attorney submits a review objective whose primary filter is an explicit negation. The matter involves merger litigation; counsel wants to identify discussions of merger logistics while excluding any document that touches settl…

The parsed task representation encodes 'reference settlement terms, mediation, or offers of compromise' as a hard boolean NOT (exclusion) gate that is applied after topic matching. A document that discusses both merger planning and settlement terms is excluded, not included. The auditable rationale…

A privilege reviewer submits a responsiveness objective that explicitly mandates exclusion of attorney-client privileged communications before any relevance scoring occurs. The matter is a civil antitrust action; the review works…

The parser flags 'excluding any and all attorney-client privileged communications' as a categorical pre-filter gate applied before relevance scoring begins—not as a negative relevance weight. Any document bearing a privilege assertion is excluded from the review set regardless of its relevance scor…

A project manager pastes a full matter-specific review protocol into the objective field. The protocol is 2,400 words and structured as: (1) responsiveness criteria, (2) issues coding definitions, (3) custodian scope, (4) date ra…

Before any document decisions are made, the system detects that the submitted objective exceeds the safe ingestion limit, surfaces a visible, specific error message identifying (a) the approximate character/token count at which truncation would occur, (b) which named sections of the protocol fall a…