All evals
Arctic Wolf

Eval directory · Security Operations

Evals for Arctic Wolf

Evaluation packs covering adversarial robustness, safety gates, workflow quality, and operator-level checks for Arctic Wolf AI products.

About Arctic Wolf

Arctic Wolf is a leading security operations company that delivers 24×7 monitoring, detection, and response through its cloud-native Concierge Security model. It serves thousands of organizations that lack the resources to staff a full in-house SOC.

Employees

~2,000

Industry

Managed Security Operations

Headquarters

Eden Prairie, MN

Use the eval library for Arctic Wolf

All 48 test cases — inputs, expected behavior, and pass/fail checks — runnable in Corsac with your own data.

Generate your own →

Coverage map

What would you measure for Arctic Wolf?

4 areas · 48 graded scenarios

Every eval set is graded on

  • Adversarial robustness
  • Workflow quality
  • Safety gates
  • Operator quality

Pass/Fail + LLM judge 1–5 · critical severity flags · negative controls

01

Adversarial Security Validation V1

Adversarial eval for prompt injection, attacker-crafted context, false-positive pressure, and unsafe remediation attempts.

Mapped capabilities

12 scenarios

  • Prompt Injection Resistance
  • Tool Abuse Resistance
  • False-Positive Pressure Handling

Example criterion: The workflow resists attacker-shaped context, preserves escalation discipline, and avoids unsafe remediation under pressure.

02

Expert Safety Gate Eval V1

Safety-gate eval for risky response decisions, escalation discipline, and policy-boundary enforcement.

Mapped capabilities

12 scenarios

  • Unsafe Action Refusal
  • Escalation Discipline
  • Policy Boundary Enforcement

Example criterion: The safety gate blocks overreach, escalates genuinely dangerous incidents, and keeps operators inside policy boundaries.

03

Power User Ops Eval V1

Operator-facing eval focused on evidence quality, handoff completeness, and low-noise workflow control.

Mapped capabilities

12 scenarios

  • Evidence Traceability
  • Handoff Quality
  • Noise Discipline

Example criterion: Power users receive traceable, low-noise outputs that improve handoffs and reduce rework under pressure.

04

Workflow Painpoint Eval V1

Buyer-facing workflow eval covering triage, prioritization, and investigation quality.

Mapped capabilities

12 scenarios

  • Alert Triage Accuracy
  • Investigation Usefulness
  • Buyer-Visible Fit

Example criterion: The workflow reliably separates urgent incidents from low-signal noise, preserves analyst trust, and produces actionable guidance.

Frequently asked questions

What do the Corsac evals for Arctic Wolf test?+

Each eval pack tests Arctic Wolf's public product surface — including Adversarial Security Validation V1, Expert Safety Gate Eval V1, Power User Ops Eval V1 — against graded scenarios covering adversarial robustness, workflow quality, safety gates, and operator quality. Every pack is runnable in Corsac with your own data.

How are the Arctic Wolf evals scored?+

Every eval set is graded the same way: pass/fail checks plus an LLM judge scoring 1–5 against each case's expected behavior, with critical-severity flags and negative controls. Only judge-passed evals are published.

How many test cases does the Arctic Wolf library include?+

The Arctic Wolf eval library includes 48 graded test cases across 4 eval packs. Each case defines an input, expected behavior, and pass/fail criteria.

How do I run these evals against Arctic Wolf or my own agent?+

Request the library with your work email above and we'll set it up in a Corsac workspace, where you can run every test case against Arctic Wolf or your own agent with your own data.