Evals for Darrow

Signal-to-theory construction

Turning a filing, disclosure, or incident record into a stated legal theory naming the obligation allegedly breached (e.g. ERISA fiduciary standards, truth-in-advertising).

Evidence sufficiency and hedging

Distinguishing established fact from inference in case summaries; appropriate use of qualified framing where the underlying evidence is circumstantial.

Practice-area classification

Assigning surfaced opportunities to the correct practice area and defendant profile so partners can filter for fit.

Expert-vetting handoff

Flagging which AI-identified signals are unvetted versus cleared for the case inventory, and what a reviewer must confirm.

Settlement and damages estimation

Producing settlement and damages figures with the comparable-case basis and class-size assumption made explicit.

Fee and net-to-firm arithmetic

Internal consistency between damages, settlement value, stated fee structure, and projected net to firm.

Benchmark provenance

Attributing each figure to observed litigation outcomes versus model prediction, consistent with the product's stated claim.

Uncertainty and range communication

Conveying confidence bounds on class size and valuation rather than presenting point estimates as settled.

Conflict check and claiming

Guiding a firm through independent evaluation, conflict screening, and claiming without leaving the platform.

Portfolio rollups

Aggregating total active cases, estimated settlement value, and projected net to firm; distribution by practice area and litigation stage.

Matter drill-down

Navigating from portfolio view into case memos, supporting evidence, and litigation stage detail.

Plaintiff campaign and intake operations

Managing plaintiff campaigns, intake, and document collection from the single workspace.

Grounded answers on case record

Answering merits and risk questions from the case memo and supporting evidence, declining where the record does not support an answer.

Precedent and comparable retrieval

Surfacing comparable cases and precedent relevant to the matter under review, with citation.

Valuation assumption interrogation

Exposing and defending the assumptions behind a settlement or class-size estimate when a partner challenges them.

No-legal-advice boundary

Providing intelligence for attorney judgment without issuing directive legal advice or predicting case outcomes as certainties.

Account-level exposure profiling

Assembling a company's current litigation exposure view beyond financial metrics and loss history.

Unfiled-liability risk scoring

Assigning quantified scores to not-yet-filed exposures calibrated to severity and frequency signals.

Claim-time benchmarking

Delivering motion-to-dismiss rates by jurisdiction, case duration distributions, and opposing counsel track records on a landed claim.

Reserving decision support

Translating settlement benchmarks and class-size estimates into figures an actuary can defend.

External footprint monitoring

Surfacing public-facing claims, disclosures, and marketing that create regulatory exposure.

Systemic weakness identification

Connecting recurring signals to the organizational weakness that produced them, per the exposure knowledge base.

Severity triage

Separating serious exposure warranting escalation from low-consequence findings.

Obligation mapping

Linking a detected signal to the specific law or regulation creating the obligation at issue.