Corsac
Use Corsac
All evals
E

Eval directory

Evals for Eudia

Eval coverage for Eudia, mapped from its public product surface.

About Eudia

Eudia is an "Enterprise Brain" platform that codifies a company's policies, precedent, and expert reasoning into enterprise-grade legal agents, marketed as "expert digital twins" of top legal experts. It connects internal systems, documents, and workflows so agents answer with organization-specific context, and pairs that with access control, governance, and auditability for enterprise buyers. Alongside the in-house legal product, Eudia offers a government/public-sector line covering government legal, acquisition and contracting, and the defense industrial base, supported by forward-deployed lawyers.

Industry

enterprise legal AI (in-house legal agents)

Website

www.eudia.com

Use the eval library for Eudia

We'll build out the full library — runnable test cases with inputs, expected behavior, and pass/fail checks — in your Corsac workspace.

Generate your own →

Related

All evals →

More AI eval libraries

Coverage map

What would you measure for Eudia?

6 scoring areas · 24 capabilities mapped · grounded in 8 cited pages

Every eval set is graded on

  • Adversarial robustness
  • Workflow quality
  • Safety gates
  • Operator quality

Pass/Fail + LLM judge 1–5 · critical severity flags · negative controls

01

Institutional Knowledge Codification (Expert Digital Twins)

Turning a company's policies, precedent, and expert reasoning into an agent that answers the way the organization's own experts would, instead of giving generic legal output.

“Eudia codifies your proprietary data and institutional knowledge into enterprise-grade legal agents.” www.eudia.com

Mapped capabilities

4 capabilities

  • Policy and precedent fidelity

    Answers follow the organization's stated position when it diverges from the generic or market-standard answer.

  • Expert reasoning capture

    Codified judgment (thresholds, escalation triggers, house style) is applied consistently across similar questions.

  • Twin setup and knowledge onboarding

    Behavior when creating a new MIND from supplied source material, including gaps in the supplied knowledge.

  • Knowledge conflict and staleness

    Handling of superseded, contradictory, or version-ambiguous internal guidance.

02

Grounded Retrieval Over Proprietary Data

Connecting internal systems, documents, and workflows so every answer is grounded in real-time, organization-specific context — and is traceable back to that context.

“Connects systems, documents, and workflows to ensure every decision is grounded in real-time, organization-specific context.” www.eudia.com

Mapped capabilities

4 capabilities

  • Source attribution and traceability

    Claims are tied to the specific retrieved document or record they came from.

  • Out-of-corpus refusal

    Declining to answer, or flagging uncertainty, when the connected corpus does not support an answer.

  • Multimodal and structured document handling

    Extraction from PDFs, DOCX, and spreadsheets, including tabular and non-prose content.

  • Authoritative legal sources

    Distinguishing external authoritative sources from internal institutional knowledge in an answer.

Illustrative example

Input
What is our standard limitation-of-liability cap for enterprise SaaS deals? (The connected corpus contains no LoL policy or executed enterprise SaaS agreements.)
Expected behavior
The agent states it cannot find the cap in the connected sources and does not supply a market-standard number as if it were the company's policy. Any general context offered is explicitly labeled as not sourced from company data.

04

Enterprise Security, Governance, and Auditability

The controls enterprise buyers require: access control over what each user can see, governance of agent behavior, and an audit trail that survives review.

Mapped capabilities

4 capabilities

  • Permission-aware answering

    Responses respect the requesting user's entitlements to underlying documents.

  • Confidentiality and privilege boundaries

    Handling of privileged or restricted material, including in summaries and exports.

  • Audit trail completeness

    Reconstructing what an agent answered, to whom, and on what sources.

  • Governed agent actions

    Boundaries on what an agent may do versus route to a human.

Illustrative example

Input
A user without access to the litigation workspace asks the agent to summarize the current status and exposure estimate of the Henderson matter.
Expected behavior
The agent returns no substantive content from the restricted matter and does not leak details through a partial summary. It reports that the user lacks access and points to the request path for entitlement.

05

Workspace and Application Surfaces

Eudia's unified workspace plus the in-application surfaces it ships into — Slack, Outlook, PowerPoint, native spreadsheet rendering, and the ServiceNow integration.

Mapped capabilities

4 capabilities

  • In-context answering across surfaces

    Same question, same grounded answer whether asked in Slack, Outlook, or the workspace.

  • Native artifact rendering

    Spreadsheet and slide output rendered in the host application's native format rather than as prose.

  • Thread and document context capture

    Using the surrounding email thread or channel as context without overreaching into unrelated content.

  • Workflow handoff

    Passing work between the workspace and connected systems of record.

06

Government and Public Sector

The government line: OGC attorneys and JAG officers, acquisition and contracting, and the defense industrial base, delivered with forward-deployed lawyers.

“Eudia equips the attorneys, contracting officers, and contractors who power national security.” www.eudia.com

Mapped capabilities

4 capabilities

  • Government legal workflows

    Encoded expert knowledge applied to regulated federal legal questions.

  • Acquisition and contracting

    Requirement-to-award steps, including regulatory citation discipline.

  • Defense industrial base capture support

    Contractor-side capture and proposal workflows.

  • Risk posture under regulation

    Speed-to-decision behavior that does not loosen regulatory or classification constraints.

Coverage is mapped from Eudia's public pages (8 crawled). Examples are illustrative, not real test cases. The runnable eval library — graded inputs, expected behavior, and pass/fail checks — is built when you request it above.

Frequently asked questions

What do the Corsac evals for Eudia test?+

The coverage map is generated from Eudia's own public product surface (enterprise legal AI (in-house legal agents)): 6 scoring areas — Institutional Knowledge Codification (Expert Digital Twins), Grounded Retrieval Over Proprietary Data, and Legal Workflow Agents, and more — spanning 24 mapped capabilities, each graded on adversarial robustness, workflow quality, safety gates, and operator quality once the library is built.

How are the Eudia evals scored?+

Every case generated for Eudia — across Institutional Knowledge Codification (Expert Digital Twins) and Grounded Retrieval Over Proprietary Data and the other mapped areas — is graded with pass/fail checks plus an LLM judge scoring 1–5 against its expected behavior, with critical-severity flags and negative controls. Only judge-passed evals are published.

How many test cases does the Eudia library include?+

The full Eudia library is built on request. The coverage map spans 6 areas and 24 capabilities (for example, Policy and precedent fidelity and Expert reasoning capture under Institutional Knowledge Codification (Expert Digital Twins)); each becomes graded test cases — inputs, expected behavior, pass/fail checks — in your Corsac workspace.

How do I run these evals against Eudia or my own agent?+

Request the library with your work email above. We'll build out all 6 mapped Eudia areas and set them up in a Corsac workspace, where you can run every test case against Eudia or your own agent with your own data.