All evals
OpenEvidence

Eval directory

Evals for OpenEvidence

10 evaluation packs covering adversarial robustness, safety gates, workflow quality, and operator-level checks for OpenEvidence AI products.

Medical & Clinical AI
Use evals for OpenEvidence

About OpenEvidence

OpenEvidence is a medical AI platform for clinicians that provides point-of-care answers grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature. Its mission is to organize and expand the world's collective medical knowledge.

Industry

Medical AI / Clinical Decision Support

80/ 100
BStrong coverage

How complete this published benchmark library is across datasets, metrics, rubrics, use-case maps, and pack context. This is library coverage, not an agent performance score.

Test datasets

10/10 packs

Scoring metrics

10/10 packs

Judge rubrics

10/10 packs

Use-case maps

0/10 packs

Pack context

10/10 packs

Test datasetsStrong100%
Scoring metricsStrong100%
Judge rubricsStrong100%
Use-case mapsLimited0%
Pack contextStrong100%

Available eval packs for OpenEvidence

10 packs ready to run.

Why eval OpenEvidence AI

OpenEvidence's AI features ship behind brand promises about accuracy, safety, and reliability. Buyers and integrators need to know those promises hold up under adversarial prompts, edge-case workflows, and the long tail of real customer inputs — not just the demo path.

The Corsac eval library for OpenEvidence measures four dimensions teams care about most when deploying medical & clinical ai agents:

  • Adversarial robustness — does the agent resist prompt injection, jailbreaks, and social-engineering attempts?
  • Workflow quality— does it complete the task buyers were shown in the demo, on inputs that don't look like the demo?
  • Safety gates — does it escalate or refuse when it should, and only then?
  • Operator quality — does it preserve analyst trust by surfacing the right context at the right time?

Every eval pack above is hand-authored against OpenEvidence's public product surface and runnable in Corsac with your own data.