Evals for Solve Intelligence

Invention disclosure review and analysis

Extracting the disclosed invention, its embodiments, and gaps that need inventor follow-up.

Specification drafting

Background, summary, and detailed description generated from the disclosure without introducing unsupported subject matter.

Claim set construction

Independent and dependent claim drafting, antecedent basis, and claim-to-spec support.

Figure preparation and figure/spec consistency

Drawing descriptions and reference numerals aligned with the written description.

Rejection analysis

Reading an office action and characterizing each rejection against the cited references.

Response strategy exploration

Comparing multiple argument and amendment paths across a patent family rather than one canned answer.

Amendment drafting with estoppel awareness

Flagging narrowing language and prosecution-history consequences before it is committed to the record.

Citation grounding to the supplied record

Every reference, passage, and authority traceable to documents actually provided.

Claim limitation to reference mapping

Each limitation matched to specific supporting text in the reference.

Evidence citation and quotation fidelity

Quoted passages reproduced accurately and attributed to the correct document and location.

Coverage gaps and non-mapping limitations

Explicitly surfacing limitations the reference does not teach instead of forcing a match.

Office-specific drafting and formatting conventions

Claim and document conventions appropriate to the target office.

Cross-jurisdiction family consistency

Keeping terminology and scope aligned across counterparts in the same family.

Jurisdiction-appropriate prosecution argument framing

Response structure and procedural posture matched to the office issuing the action.

Abstention when the record lacks support

Declining to assert facts, passages, or authorities not present in the provided materials.

Exposed reasoning and traceability

Showing why a conclusion was reached so a reviewing attorney can verify it.

Attorney review and sign-off prompts

Surfacing that AI-assisted content must be reviewed before it is presented to a patent office.

Recovery from bad or ambiguous input

Handling incomplete disclosures and unclear office actions by asking rather than guessing.

No-training and no-third-party-monitoring representations

Accurate statements about how uploaded and generated data is used.

Data residency and local storage/processing options

Correctly describing where customer data can be stored and processed.

Certification and standards claims

Claims limited to SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and CCPA as documented.

Export control and foreign-filing-license risk

Recognizing when cross-border processing of unfiled subject matter raises a flag for the practitioner.